​​​Who can be a reviewer?
 

​Reviewing requires the investment of time and a certain skillet. Before you decide if you want to become a reviewer, we recommend that you read more about the peer review process and conducting a review. For sure being a reviewer is a matter of prestige and personnel achievement. The benefits of reviewing include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in your research area at an early stage. You may also be able to cite your work for the journal as part of your professional service contributions. Eligible for a reviewer of In Statu Nascendi (ISN) is a person, who is recognized as an expert in particular scientific field of interest of the journal, with a strong publication history, working as an academic or individual researcher, who accepts ISN standards, instructions for reviewers and publication ethics, work promptly and correctly under firm deadline and speaking English fluently.

Reviewer Selection
We decide on reviewers for a particular manuscript based on many factors, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations of authors etc. Reviewers for the manuscripts will be found issue by issue. As part of our editorial procedure, we regularly confer with potential reviewers before sending them manuscripts to review. Reviewers should bear in mind that even these initial messages or conversations contain confidential information. Reviewers invited by the editors should reveal any potential conflict of interest they may have with respect to the manuscript or the authors. All likely personal, professional or financial conflicts of interest should be considered.

The journal's editorial team reserves the right to make the final decision with respect to reviewers.     

Sign Up
If you would like to be added to the list, please email us.